FGDC Classic | FGDC FAQ | FGDC Plus | XML

Connecticut Route Segments
SDE Feature Class - depgis.DEP.ROUTESEGMENTS
FGDC, ESRI Metadata
DescriptionGraphicSpatialData StructureData QualityData SourceData DistributionMetadata
+ Resource Description
Citation
Information used to reference the data.
Title: Connecticut Route Segments
Originators: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection (data editor and publisher)
University of Connecticut, Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (data editor and publisher)
U.S Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division (data compiler)
Publisher: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
Publication place: Hartford, Connecticut, USA
Publication date: 20031201
Data type: vector digital data
Data location: http://www.ct.gov/deep
Other citation details:
Data compiled at 1:100,000 scale.
Description
A characterization of the data, including its intended use and limitations.
Abstract:
Connecticut Route Segments is a 1:100,000-scale, feature-based layer developed for the purpose of creating the Connecticut Routes layer. The Connecticut Route Segments layer includes Interstate Highways, US Routes, State Routes and route connectors in Connecticut based on information from the U.S Bureau of Census that was published for Connecticut by the University of Connecticut, Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. The Connecticut Route Segments layer details a network of automobile route segments and represents individual Interstate Highways, US Routes, State Routes and connectors as sets of connecting and intersecting line features. Individual line features begin and end at intersections with other routes. Attributes include route class and route number for each line feature (route segment). Types of route class include Interstate Highway, US Route, State Route, and connectors. In order to reflect the complexity of the route network where routes occasionally merge together and share the same line features at bridge crossings or through metropolitan areas, a single line feature may depict the location of up to five different routes. The Connecticut Route Segments layer is based on information compiled for the year 2000 and may not necessarily depict current conditions. The layer does not include local roads, highway entrance and exit ramps, highway rest areas, exit numbers, house address, traffic direction, or traffic volume information. Features are linear and represent divided and undivided route centerlines mapped at 1:100,000 scale (1 inch = 1.578 mile).
Purpose:
Connecticut Route Segments is an intermediate spatial data product developed for the purpose of creating, maintaining, and updating the 1:100,000-scale Connecticut Routes layer. The line feature topology and attribute information are designed to support an automated process with ArcView 3.3 that creates the Connecticut Routes layer. The Connecticut Route Segments layer has no other known purpose. Nevertheless, it may have potential value in other applications due to the quality and accuracy of the route class and number attribute information that was carefully attributed, checked and compared with Connecticut State Tourism Map 2002-2003 published by the Connecticut Department of Transportation. Use the derivative product, the Connecticut Routes layer, to cartographically depict routes with highway and route number shields on a map. Each route in the Connecticut Routes layer is depicted as a continuous, non-intersecting line feature that is the result of merging (appending) line features from the Connecticut Route Segments layer.
Supplemental information:
The ArcView 3.3 Avenue Script that creates the Connecticut Routes shapefile from the Connecticut Route Segments shapefile is named zViewMakeRoutes.txt and is included with the Connecticut Route Segments shapefiile download from the State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection Website. This script merges all linear segments that comprise each route in the Connecticut Route Segments shapefile into a single, continuous linear feature for the Connecticut Routes shapefile.
Dataset credit:
The Connecticut Routes Segments layer is derived from the Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 layer, which was compiled and published by Ellen Cromley and Richard Mrozinski from the University of Connecticut, Center for Geographic Information and Analysis.
Language of dataset: en
Point Of Contact
Contact information for the individual or organization that is knowledgeable about the data.
Organization: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
Person: Howie Sternberg
Phone: 860-424-3540
Fax: 860-424-4058
Email: dep.gisdata@ct.gov
Hours of service: Monday to Friday, 08:30 to 16:30 Eastern Standard Time
Address type: mailing and physical address
Address:
79 Elm Street
City: Hartford
State or Province: Connecticut
Postal code: 06106-5127
Country: USA
Data Type
How the data are represented, formatted and maintained by the data producing organization.
File or table name: depgis.DEP.ROUTESEGMENTS
Data type: vector digital data
Data format: SDE Feature Class
Native dataset environment: This data is maintained by the State of Connecticut using ArcView software developed by Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) in a Microsoft Windows operating system environment.
Time Period of Data
Time period(s) for which the data corresponds to the currentness reference.
Date: 2003
Currentness reference:
ground condition
Status
The state of and maintenance information for the data.
Data status: Complete
Update frequency: None planned
Key Words
Words or phrases that summarize certain aspects of the data.
Theme:
Keywords: TIGER/Line, small scale, transportation, road, interstate, highway, route, base map
Keyword thesaurus: None
Theme:
Keywords: transportation
Keyword thesaurus: ISO 19115 Toipic Category
Place:
Keywords: Connecticut, CT
Keyword thesaurus: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1987, Codes for the Identification of the States, the District of Columbia and the Outlying Areas of The United States, and Associated Areas (Federal Information Processing Standard 5-2): Washington, DC, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Place:
Keywords: United States of America, USA
Keyword thesaurus: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1995, Countries, Dependencies, Areas of Special Sovereignty, and Their Principal Administrative Divisions (Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 10-4): Washington, D.C., National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Data Access Constraints
Restrictions and legal prerequisites for accessing or using the data after access is granted.
Access constraints:
None. The data is in the public domain and may be redistributed.
Use constraints:
None. There are no restrictions or legal prerequisites for using the data. Once acquired, any modification made to the data must be noted in the metadata. When printing this information on a map or using it in a software application, please acknowledge the State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection; University of Connecticut, Center for Geographic Information Analysis; and U.S. Bureau of Census as the original source for this information.  For example, include the following data source description when printing this layer on a map: Roads - From the Connecticut Route Segments layer, compiled and published by CT DEP, UCONN and Census. Source map scale is 1:100,000.
+ Graphic Example
Browse Graphic
Graphic illustration of the data.
Browse graphic 1
Open - Full view of Connecticut Route Segements
Graphic Image
+ Spatial Reference Information
Horizontal Coordinate System
Reference system from which linear or angular quantities are measured and assigned to the position that a point occupies.
Projected coordinate system:
Name: NAD 1983 StatePlane Connecticut FIPS 0600 Feet
Map units: survey feet
Geographic coordinate system:
Name: GCS North American 1983
Coordinate System Details
Map projection
Map projection name: Lambert Conformal Conic
Standard parallel: 41.200000
Standard parallel: 41.866667
Longitude of central meridian: -72.750000
Latitude of projection origin: 40.833333
False easting: 999999.999996
False northing: 499999.999998
Planar Coordinate Information
Planar coordinate encoding method: coordinate pair
Coordinate representation:
Abscissa resolution: 0.000328
Ordinate resolution: 0.000328
Planar distance units: survey feet
Geodetic model
Horizontal datum name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major axis: 6378137.000000
Denominator of flattening ratio: 298.257222
Vertical Coordinate System
Reference system from which vertical distances (altitudes or depths) are measured.
Altitude system definition:
Altitude resolution: 1.000000
Altitude encoding method: Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates
Spatial Domain
The geographic areal domain of the data that describes the western, eastern, northern, and southern geographic limits of data coverage.
Bounding Coordinates
In Projected or local coordinates
NAD 1983 StatePlane Connecticut FIPS 0600 Feet
BoundaryCoordinate
Left733465.749973 (survey feet)
Right1262562.874848 (survey feet)
Top944223.374983 (survey feet)
Bottom559676.312386 (survey feet)
In Unprojected coordinates (geographic)
GCS North American 1983
BoundaryCoordinate
West-73.731296 (longitude)
East-71.783324 (longitude)
North42.052459 (latitude)
South40.993031 (latitude)
+ Data Structure and Attribute Information
Overview
Summary of the information content of the data, including other references to complete descriptions of entity types, attributes, and attribute values for the data.
Entity and attribute overview:
Includes linear route features such as highways, routes, and connectors. Information encoded about features includes route class and number.
Entity and attribute detailed citation:
Other than the metadata for the Connecticut Routes layer, the information in this metadata document is the only reference that describes the Connecticut Route Segment entities and attributes.
Direct spatial reference method: Vector
Attributes of depgis.DEP.ROUTESEGMENTS
Detailed descriptions of entity type, attributes, and attribute values for the data.
Name: depgis.DEP.ROUTESEGMENTS
Type of object: Feature Class
Geometry type: Polyline
Number of records: 1971
Description:
Route segments as line features
Source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection; University of Connecticut, Center for Geographic Information and Analysis; and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division
Attributes
NAME
Definition:
Name of connector if the CLASS1 attribute value is Connector.
Alias: NAME Type: String Width: 40 Precision: 0 Scale: 0Output width: 8
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
Bradley International Airport Connector
Bradley International Airport Connector
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Branford Connector
Branford Connector
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Hammonasset Connector
Hammonasset Connector
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Milford Parkway
Milford Parkway
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Montville Connector
Montville Connector
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Rocky Neck Connector
Rocky Neck Connector
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Route 6 Connector
Route 6 Connector
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Route 9 Connector
Route 9 Connector
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Sherwood Island Connector
Sherwood Island Connector
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Wharton Brook Connector
Wharton Brook Connector
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Attribute definition source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
Shape
Definition:
Feature geometry.
Alias: Shape Type: Geometry Width: 4 Precision: 0 Scale: 0
Attribute values: Coordinates defining the features.
Attribute definition source:
ESRI
LEGEND
Definition:
Text field for symbolizing road types on a map.
Alias: LEGEND Type: String Width: 20 Precision: 0 Scale: 0Output width: 5
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
Interstate
Interstate Highways such as Interstate 95 that are typically symbolized with a wide red or blue line
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
US Route
US Routes such as US Route 1 that are typically symbolized with a medium width red line
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
State Route
State Routes such as State Route 2 that are typically symbolized with a narrow width red line
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Connector
Connectors such as the Hammonasset Connector that are typically symbolized with a narrow black or grey line
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Attribute definition source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
CLASS1
Definition:
Class for ROUTE1. This field value modifies and describes the type of route specified in the ROUTE1 field. If the value is Connector, this field does not describe the type of route specified in the ROUTE1 field but rather indicates the route segment is a connector whose name is specified in the NAME field.
Alias: CLASS1 Type: String Width: 20 Precision: 0 Scale: 0Output width: 5
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
Connector
For route segments that are connectors with values in the NAME field.
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Interstate
For route segments that are Interstates such as Interstate 84.
Definition Source:
CT DEP,  CT DOT
State Route
For route segments that are State Routes such as State Route 3.
Definition Source:
CT DEP,  CT DOT
US Route
For route segments that are US Routes such as US Route 1A.
Definition Source:
CT DEP,  CT DOT
Attribute definition source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
ROUTE1
Definition:
Route for CLASS1. This field value indicates the route number for the type of route specified in the CLASS1 field.
Alias: ROUTE1 Type: String Width: 5 Precision: 0 Scale: 0Output width: 5
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
1A
US Route 1A
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
3
State Route 3
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
4
State Route 4
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
5
US Route 5
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
9
State Route 9
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
11
State Route 11
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
12
State Route 12
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
16
State Route 16
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
17A
State Route 17A
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
19
State Route 19
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
20
State Route 20
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
21
State Route 21
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
27
State Route 27
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
30
State Route 30
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
31
State Route 31
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
35
State Route 35
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
37
State Route 37
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
40
State Route 40
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
41
State Route 41
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
43
State Route 43
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
53
State Route 53
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
55
State Route 55
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
58
State Route 58
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
59
State Route 59
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
61
State Route 61
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
63
State Route 63
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
66
State Route 66
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
68
State Route 68
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
71
State Route 71
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
71A
State Route 71A
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
73
State Route 73
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
75
State Route 75
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
77
State Route 77
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
78
State Route 78
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
79
State Route 79
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
80
State Route 80
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
84
Interstate 84
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
87
State Route 87
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
89
State Route 89
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
91
Interstate 91
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
94
State Route 94
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
95
Interstate 95
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
97
State Route 97
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
99
State Route 99
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
100
State Route 100
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
101
State Route 101
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
103
State Route 103
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
106
State Route 106
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
108
State Route 108
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
109
State Route 109
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
110
State Route 110
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
111
State Route 111
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
112
State Route 112
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
113
State Route 113
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
114
State Route 114
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
115
State Route 115
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
116
State Route 116
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
117
State Route 117
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
118
State Route 118
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
120
State Route 120
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
121
State Route 121
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
122
State Route 122
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
123
State Route 123
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
125
State Route 125
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
126
State Route 126
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
127
State Route 127
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
128
State Route 128
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
130
State Route 130
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
131
State Route 131
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
132
State Route 132
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
133
State Route 133
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
135
State Route 135
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
136
State Route 136
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
137
State Route 137
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
139
State Route 139
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
140
State Route 140
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
142
State Route 142
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
146
State Route 146
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
148
State Route 148
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
149
State Route 149
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
150
State Route 150
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
152
State Route 152
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
153
State Route 153
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
154
State Route 154
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
155
State Route 155
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
156
State Route 156
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
157
State Route 157
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
161
State Route 161
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
162
State Route 162
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
163
State Route 163
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
164
State Route 164
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
166
State Route 166
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
167
State Route 167
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
168
State Route 168
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
171
State Route 171
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
172
State Route 172
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
173
State Route 173
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
174
State Route 174
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
175
State Route 175
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
176
State Route 176
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
178
State Route 178
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
179
State Route 179
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
181
State Route 181
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
182
State Route 182
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
183
State Route 183
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
184
State Route 184
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
185
State Route 185
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
186
State Route 186
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
188
State Route 188
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
190
State Route 190
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
192
State Route 192
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
193
State Route 193
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
194
State Route 194
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
195
State Route 195
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
196
State Route 196
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
197
State Route 197
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
182A
State Route 182A
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
199
State Route 199
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
200
State Route 200
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
203
State Route 203
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
205
State Route 205
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
207
State Route 207
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
209
State Route 209
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
213
State Route 213
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
214
State Route 214
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
215
State Route 215
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
216
State Route 216
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
217
State Route 217
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
220
State Route 220
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
222
State Route 222
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
229
State Route 229
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
234
State Route 234
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
243
State Route 243
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
244
State Route 244
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
254
State Route 254
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
262
State Route 262
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
263
State Route 263
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
272
State Route 272
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
275
State Route 275
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
286
State Route 286
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
289
State Route 289
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
291
Interstate 291
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
302
State Route 302
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
305
State Route 305
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
309
State Route 309
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
313
State Route 313
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
314
State Route 314
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
315
State Route 315
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
316
State Route 316
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
317
State Route 317
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
319
State Route 319
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
322
State Route 322
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
334
State Route 334
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
337
State Route 337
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
341
State Route 341
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
343
State Route 343
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
349
State Route 349
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
354
State Route 354
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
361
State Route 361
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
364
State Route 364
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
384
Interstate 384
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
395
Interstate 395
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
684
Interstate 684
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
691
Interstate 691
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
835
State Route 835
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Attribute definition source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
CLASS2
Definition:
Class for ROUTE2. This field value modifies and describes the type of route specified in the ROUTE2 field.
Alias: CLASS2 Type: String Width: 20 Precision: 0 Scale: 0Output width: 5
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
State Route
For route segments that are State Routes such as US Route 2A.
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
US Route
For route segments that are US Routes such as US Route 1.
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Attribute definition source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
ROUTE2
Definition:
Route for CLASS2. This field value indicates the route number for the type of route specified in the CLASS2 field.
Alias: ROUTE2 Type: String Width: 5 Precision: 0 Scale: 0Output width: 12
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
1
US Route 1
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
2A
State Route 2A
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
8
State Route 8
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
14
State Route 14
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
14A
State Route 14A
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
15
State Route 15
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
17
State Route 17
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
32
State Route 32
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
33
State Route 33
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
34
State Route 34
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
39
State Route 39
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
42
State Route 42
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
45
State Route 45
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
47
State Route 47
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
57
State Route 57
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
64
State Route 64
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
67
State Route 67
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
69
State Route 69
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
70
State Route 70
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
72
State Route 72
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
81
State Route 81
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
82
State Route 82
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
83
State Route 83
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
85
State Route 85
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
102
State Route 102
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
104
State Route 104
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
107
State Route 107
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
124
State Route 124
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
145
State Route 145
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
147
State Route 147
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
151
State Route 151
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
159
State Route 159
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
160
State Route 160
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
165
State Route 165
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
177
State Route 177
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
191
State Route 191
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
198
State Route 198
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
201
State Route 201
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
202
US Route 202
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
218
State Route 218
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
219
State Route 219
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
318
State Route 318
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
320
State Route 320
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
372
State Route 372
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Attribute definition source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
CLASS3
Definition:
Class for ROUTE3. This field value modifies and describes the type of route specified in the ROUTE3 field.
Alias: CLASS3 Type: String Width: 20 Precision: 0 Scale: 0Output width: 5
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
State Route
For route segments that are State Routes such as State Route 2.
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
US Route
For route segments that are US Routes such as US Route 7.
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Attribute definition source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
ROUTE3
Definition:
Route for CLASS3. This field value indicates the route number for the type of route specified in the CLASS3 field.
Alias: ROUTE3 Type: String Width: 5 Precision: 0 Scale: 0Output width: 5
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
2
State Route 2
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
7
US Route 7
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
10
State Route 10
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
22
State Route 22
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
25
State Route 25
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
41
State Route 41
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
49
State Route 49
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
74
State Route 74
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
169
State Route 169
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
187
State Route 187
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
287
State Route 287
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Attribute definition source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
CLASS4
Definition:
Class for ROUTE4. This field value modifies and describes the type of route specified in the ROUTE4 field.
Alias: CLASS4 Type: String Width: 20 Precision: 0 Scale: 0Output width: 10
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
State Route
For route segments that are State Routes such as State Route 138.
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
US Route
For route segments that are US Routes such as US Route 6.
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Attribute definition source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
ROUTE4
Definition:
Route for CLASS4. This field value indicates the route number for the type of route specified in the CLASS4 field.
Alias: ROUTE4 Type: String Width: 5 Precision: 0 Scale: 0Output width: 50
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
6
US Route 6
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
138
State Route 138
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
189
State Route 189
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Attribute definition source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
CLASS5
Definition:
Class for ROUTE5. This field value modifies and describes the type of route specified in the ROUTE5 field.
Alias: CLASS5 Type: String Width: 20 Precision: 0 Scale: 0Output width: 20
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
US Route
For route segments that are US Routes such as US Route 44.
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Attribute definition source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
ROUTE5
Definition:
Route for CLASS5. This field value indicates the route number for the type of route specified in the CLASS5 field.
Alias: ROUTE5 Type: String Width: 5 Precision: 0 Scale: 0Output width: 20
Attribute domain values
ValueDefinition
44
US Route 44
Definition Source:
CT DEP, CT DOT
Attribute definition source:
State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
OBJECTID
Definition:
Internal feature number.
Alias: OBJECTID Type: OID Width: 4 Precision: 10 Scale: 0
Attribute values: Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute definition source:
ESRI
Shape.len
Alias: Shape.len Type: Double Width: 0 Precision: 0 Scale: 0
ESRI Feature Description
Description of spatial objects in the data using the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) terminology.
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) terms
depgis.DEP.ROUTESEGMENTS
ESRI feature type: Simple
Geometry type: Polyline
Topology: FALSE
Feature count: 1971
Spatial index: TRUE
Linear referencing: FALSE
SDTS Feature Description
Description of point and vector spatial objects in the data using the Spatial Data Transfer Standards (SDTS) terminology.
Spatial data transfer standard (SDTS) terms
depgis.DEP.ROUTESEGMENTS
Type: String
Count: 1971
+ Data Quality and Accuracy Information
General
Information about the fidelity of relationships, data quality and accuracy tests, omissions, selection criteria, generalization, and definitions used to derive the data.
Logical consistency report:
Line features conform to the following topological rules. Lines are single part. There are no duplicate lines. Lines do not self overlap. Lines do not overlap other lines. Lines intersect only at nodes, and all nodes anchor the ends of lines. Lines do not overshoot or undershoot other lines they are supposed to meet and intersect. The tests of logical consistency were performed by the State of Connecticut using ESRI ArcInfo software to maintain feature topology in ArcInfo coverage format. The data is topologically clean. The ArcInfo Clean function was repeatedly used following edits to verify topology and enforce a minimum distance between vertices of 4 feet (fuzzy tolerance) and a minimum allowed overshoot length of 10 feet (dangle length). Due to the topology verification process, there may be minor differences in feature geometry between certain features in this layer and the original data source from the University of Connecticut, Center for Center for Geographic Information and Analysis.
Completeness report:
The completeness of the data reflects the content of Connecticut State Tourism Map 2002-2003 published by the Connecticut Department of Transportation. This layer includes all highways and routes depicted on the Connecticut State Tourism map, with feature geometry based on information from the U.S Bureau of Census that was published for Connecticut by the University of Connecticut, Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. This data does not include local roads, interstate highway entrance ramps, exit ramps, exit numbers, rest areas. This data is not updated.
Attribute Accuracy
Accuracy of the identification of data entities, features and assignment of attribute values.
Attribute accuracy report:
The Connecticut Route Segments layer does not retain the full breadth of feature types in the source layers originally compiled and published by the U.S. Bureau of Census or the University of Connecticut, Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. Rather, the Connecticut Route Segments layer is simpler and comprised of a subset of four basic feature types: Interstate Highways, U.S. Routes, State Routes, and connectors. Each line feature is capable of describing one or more route due to the presence of five pairs of CLASS and ROUTE fields that can record combinations of (merged) routes for the same route segment. This multi-field approach guarantees similar geomtery (shape) along multi-route segments without resorting to duplicating features. The names of these paired fields are CLASS1 and ROUTE1, CLASS2 and ROUTE2, CLASS3 and ROUTE3, CLASS4 and ROUTE4, CLASS5 and ROUTE5. Note, each route is always recorded in the same set of paired fields. For example, US Route 44 is always attributed in the (fifth) CLASS5 and ROUTE5 field pair, where CLASS5="US Route" and ROUTE5="44" Additionally, line features where US Route 44 and US Route 6 merge are attributed with CLASS4="US Route", ROUTE4="6", CLASS5="US Route" and ROUTE5="44". Line features where these two routes merge with Interstate 84 are additionally attributed with CLASS1="Interstate" and ROUTE1="84", and so on. There is no real logic for determining which set of paired fields is used to record a particular route other than an attempt to minimize the number of paired fields necessary to accomodate all possible combinations of multi-route segments. Values are within defined domains. The accuracy test for the CLASS(1-5) and ROUTE(1-5) attribute values was conducted by comparing the routes as they are published on the Connecticut State Tourism Map 2002-2003 with interactive displays of the routes segments on a computer graphic system. Each route was individually tested by visually inspecting and comparing its geometry in relation to road features in the Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 layer, which was compiled and published by the University of Connecticut, Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. Each route was individually highlighted in color and tested one at a time. Several tests were made to compare, edit and verify CLASS and ROUTE attribute values. Attribute values for the LEGEND field reflect the highest of the CLASS(1-5) values where Interstate is highest and connector is lowest. CONNECTOR records the name of the connector. All values are manually entered, but later programmatically validated for spelling consistency, etc.
Positional Accuracy
Accuracy of the positional aspects of the data.
Horizontal accuracy report:
The horizonal positional accuracy of this data is no better than United States National Map Accuracy Standards for 1:100,000-scale maps . According to this standard, not more than 10 percent of the points tested are to be in error by more than 1/50 inch (167 feet) measured on the publication scale of a USGS 1:100,000-scale topographic map. The following description of horizontal accuracy is taken from the metadata for the data source upon which the Connecticut Route Segments layer is based, which is the Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 layer. It cautions against using these data for measurement and detailed, large scale mapping  purposes.The information presented in these files is provided for the purposes of statistical analysis and census operations only.  Coordinates in the TIGER/Line files have six implied decimal places, but the positional accuracy of these coordinates is not as great as the six decimal places suggest.  The positional accuracy varies with the source materials used, but generally the information is no better than the established national map Accuracy standards for 1:100,000-scale maps from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS); thus it is NOT suitable for high-precision measurement applications such as engineering problems, property transfers, or other uses that might require highly accurate measurements of the earth's surface.  The USGS 1:100,000-scale maps met national map accuracy standards and use coordinates defined by the North American Datum, 1983.  For the contiguous 48 States, the cartographic fidelity of most of the Census 2000 TIGER/Line files, in areas outside the 1980 census Geographic Base File/Dual Independent map Encoding (GBF/DIME) file coverage and selected other large metropolitan areas, compare favorably with the USGS 1:100,000-scale maps.  The Census Bureau cannot specify the accuracy of features inside of what was the 1980 GBF/DIME-File coverage or selected metropolitan areas.  The Census Bureau added updates to the TIGER/Line files that enumerators annotated on maps sheets prepared from the Census TIGER data base as they attempted to traverse every street feature shown on the Census 2000 map sheets; the Census Bureau also made other corrections from updated map sheets supplied by local participants for Census Bureau programs. The locational accuracy of these updates is of unknown quality.  In addition to the Federal, State, and local sources, portions of the files may contain information obtained in part from maps and other materials prepared by private companies.  Despite the fact the TIGER/Line data positional accuracy is not as high as the coordinate values imply, the six-decimal place precision is useful when producing maps.  The precision allows features that are next to each other on the ground to be placed in the correct position, on the map, relative to each other, without overlap.
+ Data Source and Process Information
Data Sources
Information about the source data used to construct or derive the data.
Data source information
Source 1 - Street Network
Title: Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000
Originators: University of Connecticut, Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (data editor and publisher)
U.S Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division (data compiler)
Publisher: University of Connecticut, Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Publication place: Storrs, Connecticut, USA
Publication date: 2002
Data type: vector digital data
Map scale denominator: 100000
Media: disc
Source contribution:
Line features from the Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 layer with LEGEND attribute values equal to "Major Highway" or "Highway". The Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 database is a statewide database of address-ranged street segments compiled from the Census 2000 TIGER/Line files.  In order for others to use the information in the Census TIGER data base in a geographic information system (GIS) or for other geographic applications, the Census Bureau releases to the public extracts of the data base in the form of TIGER/Line files.  The University of Connecticut Center for Geographic Information and Analysis prepares databases such as The Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 database from the public extracts released by the Census Bureau as a service to the University community and the state. TIGER, TIGER/Line, and Census TIGER are registered trademarks of the U.S. Census Bureau.
Date: 2000
Currentness reference:
ground condition
Source 2 - Route Segment Geometry
Title: Route Segment Geometry
Originators: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection (data editor)
Publisher: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
Publication place: Hartford, Connecticut, USA
Publication date: Unpublished Material
Data type: vector digital data
Map scale denominator: 100000
Media: disc
Source contribution:
Line features representing the geometry (shape) for all route segments.
Date: 2000
Currentness reference:
ground condition
Source 3 - Routesegments.shp
Title: Connecticut Route Segments
Originators: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection (data editor and publisher)
Publisher: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
Publication place: Hartford, Connecticut, USA
Publication date: 20031201
Data type: vector digital data
Data location: http://www.ct.gov/deep
Map scale denominator: 100000
Media: disc
Source contribution:
Line features representing the geometry (shape) for all route segments with attributes that describe route class and route number information. Routesegments.shp is in Shapefile format.
Date: 2000
Currentness reference:
ground condition
Process Steps
Information about events, parameters, tolerances and techniques applied to construct or derive the data.
Process step information
Process Step 1
Process description:
Route Segment Geometry Creation - The process of creating the Connecticut Route Segments layer first involved developing a statewide layer with line features for all routes that conformed to the following topological rules. Lines are single part. There are no duplicate lines. Lines do not self overlap. Lines do not overlap other lines. Lines intersect only at nodes, and all nodes anchor the ends of lines. Lines do not overshoot or undershoot other lines they are supposed to meet and intersect. Lines may end without intersecting another line (deliberate dangle acceptable). Intersections must be with three or more lines (no pseudo nodes). These topological rules were applied to 1:100,000-scale based line features and ensure routes would properly connect (no gaps) and intersect each other. To begin creating the desired feature geometry, line features that defined routes in the Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 layer were extracted and separately saved to a new layer in Shapefile format. Features that were extracted from the Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 layer were based on LEGEND attribute values equal to "Major Highway" or "Highway". The resulting Shapefile included 199,636 features and depicted the geometry of most Interstates, US Routes, State Routes, and connectors. There were nearly 200,000 features in the resulting Shapefile because, for the most part, each feature represented a small section of a route that intersects with other local roads so many routes were comprised of hundreds of short features connecting to each other. After comparing the resulting Shapefile to the Connecticut State Tourism Map published by the Connecticut Department of Transportation, additional edits to the resulting Shapefile were necessary because there were small gaps along some routes (missing features) and the Shapefile included some roads that were not designated as routes on the Connecticut State Tourism Map. Since the overall process of creating the Routes Segments layer was to first establish the correct geometry and later attribute line features with route class and number information, all attributes (fields) were deleted from the Shapefile. The physical remove of attributes did not represent a loss of detailed information that could not be created later because the route number information was not consistently assigned to individual features in the Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 layer. Next, each route was carefully followed on the Connecticut State Tourism Map and visually compared to its geometry in the Shapefile. Any gaps along each route in the Shapefile were replaced with line segments manually copied and pasted from the Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 layer. One by one, each route was inspected to ensure that a continuous route could be created from a series of short line features that properly connected to and intersect with all other routes in the Shapefile. Where routes merged, only one set of line features was established (no duplicate features allowed). All line features from the initial extraction that did not appear as routes on the Connecticut State Tourism Map were deleted from the Shapefile. Once the geometry for 8 Interstates, 7 US Routes, 209 State Routes, and 10 connectors was systematically inspected, the Shapefile was converted to ArcInfo coverage format in order to more strictly enforce line topology rules. For example in ArcInfo format, line features were unsplit (merged) so that they only begin and end at intersections with other routes. This rule reduced the number of line features from approximately 200,000 to 2,000 and preserved the orginal geometry that define individual routes. Smaller road sections from the original Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 layer were merged by this rule to form longer features with the combined geometry. The ends of approximately 20 line features were manually moved no more than about 50 feet in order to close gaps along individual routes or at intersections. The ArcInfo Clean function was repeatedly used following edits to verify topology and enforce a minimum distance between vertices of 4 feet (fuzzy tolerance) and a minimum allowed overshoot length of 10 feet (dangle length). Due to the topology verification process, there may be minor differences in feature geometry between certain features in this layer and the original data source from the University of Connecticut, Center for Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. Finally, the layer was converted from ArcInfo coverage to Shapefile format once it was determined that it captured all necessary geometry and conformed to the topology rules.
Organization: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
Person: Howie Sternberg
Phone: 860-424-3540
Address type: mailing and physical address
Address:
79 Elm Street
City: Hartford
State or Province: Connecticut
Postal code: 06106
Country: USA
Process date: 2003
Process software and version: ArcView 3.3 and ArcInfo Workstation 8.3
Data Source used
Source 1 - Street Network
Title: Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000
Originators: University of Connecticut, Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (data editor and publisher)
U.S Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division (data compiler)
Publisher: University of Connecticut, Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Publication place: Storrs, Connecticut, USA
Publication date: 2002
Data type: vector digital data
Map scale denominator: 100000
Media: disc
Source contribution:
Line features from the Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 layer with LEGEND attribute values equal to "Major Highway" or "Highway". The Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 database is a statewide database of address-ranged street segments compiled from the Census 2000 TIGER/Line files.  In order for others to use the information in the Census TIGER data base in a geographic information system (GIS) or for other geographic applications, the Census Bureau releases to the public extracts of the data base in the form of TIGER/Line files.  The University of Connecticut Center for Geographic Information and Analysis prepares databases such as The Connecticut Street Network State Plane, TIGER/Line 2000 database from the public extracts released by the Census Bureau as a service to the University community and the state. TIGER, TIGER/Line, and Census TIGER are registered trademarks of the U.S. Census Bureau.
Date: 2000
Currentness reference:
ground condition
Data Source produced
Source 2 - Route Segment Geometry
Title: Route Segment Geometry
Originators: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection (data editor)
Publisher: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
Publication place: Hartford, Connecticut, USA
Publication date: Unpublished Material
Data type: vector digital data
Map scale denominator: 100000
Media: disc
Source contribution:
Line features representing the geometry (shape) for all route segments.
Date: 2000
Currentness reference:
ground condition
Process Step 2
Process description:
Assign CLASS and ROUTE attribute values - Five pairs of CLASS and ROUTE fields were added to the Shapefile in order to take into consideration situations where routes merge onto a single line feature. This multi-field approach guarantees similar geometry (shape) along multi-route segments without resorting to duplicating features. The names of these paired fields are CLASS1 and ROUTE1, CLASS2 and ROUTE2, CLASS3 and ROUTE3, CLASS4 and ROUTE4, CLASS5 and ROUTE5. The domain for the CLASS field consists of "Interstate", "US Route", "State Route", and "Connector". The associated ROUTE field stores the corresponding route number as a string.  Note, each route is always recorded in the same set of paired fields. For example, US Route 44 is always attributed in the (fifth) CLASS5 and ROUTE5 field pair, where CLASS5="US Route" and ROUTE5="44" Additionally, line features where US Route 44 and US Route 6 merge are attributed with CLASS4="US Route", ROUTE4="6", CLASS5="US Route" and ROUTE5="44". Line features where these two routes merge with Interstate 84 are additionally attributed with CLASS1="Interstate" and ROUTE1="84", and so on. Beginning with Interstates, each route was carefully followed on the Connecticut State Tourism Map so that the corresponding line features in the Shapefile could be manually selected and assigned CLASS and ROUTE attribute values using ArcView 3.3 software. All values were manually entered, but later programmatically validated for logical and spelling consistency, etc. Once the CLASS and ROUTE attribute values were correctly attributed, the LEGEND field was added to easily classify (multiple route type) features and cartographically represent them on a map. Values were attributed programatically and assigned a value of "Interstate", "US Route", "State Route" or "Connector" by comparing and taking the most dominant (route type) of the CLASS1, CLASS2, CLASS3, CLASS4 and CLASS5 attribute values. For example, if a route segment was both part of an Interstate and US Route, then the value of the LEGEND attribute was set to be "Interstate" so as to cartographically represent the line feature as an Interstate.
Organization: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
Person: Howie Sternberg
Phone: 860-424-3540
Address type: mailing and physical address
Address:
79 Elm Street
City: Hartford
State or Province: Connecticut
Postal code: 06106
Country: USA
Process date: 2003
Process software and version: ArcView 3.3
Data Source used
Source 2 - Route Segment Geometry
Title: Route Segment Geometry
Originators: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection (data editor)
Publisher: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
Publication place: Hartford, Connecticut, USA
Publication date: Unpublished Material
Data type: vector digital data
Map scale denominator: 100000
Media: disc
Source contribution:
Line features representing the geometry (shape) for all route segments.
Date: 2000
Currentness reference:
ground condition
Data Source produced
Source 3 - Routesegments.shp
Title: Connecticut Route Segments
Originators: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection (data editor and publisher)
Publisher: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
Publication place: Hartford, Connecticut, USA
Publication date: 20031201
Data type: vector digital data
Data location: http://www.ct.gov/deep
Map scale denominator: 100000
Media: disc
Source contribution:
Line features representing the geometry (shape) for all route segments with attributes that describe route class and route number information. Routesegments.shp is in Shapefile format.
Date: 2000
Currentness reference:
ground condition
ESRI geoprocessing history
Description of ESRI geoprocessing commands, settings, and tolerances applied to the data.
ESRI geoprocessing command information
1 CopyFeatures_1
Date: 20090715 Time: 085118
Tool location: C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\ArcToolbox\Toolboxes\Data Management Tools.tbx\CopyFeatures
Command issued: CopyFeatures Y:\Archive\Transportation\Transportation_24k\shapes\Routesegments.shp "Database Connections\10.18.8.60.depgis@dep_92dc.sde\depgis.DEP.ROUTESEGMENTS" DEPFEATUREDYNAMIC 0 0 0
+ Data Distribution Information
General
Description of the data known by the party from whom the data may be obtained, liability of party distributing data, and technical capabilities required to use the data.
Resource description:
Connecticut Route Segments
Distribution liability:
Although this data set  has been used by the State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection as to the accuracy of the data and or related materials.  The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed by the State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection in the use of these data or related materials. The user assumes the entire risk related to the use of these data. Once the data is distributed to the user, modifications made to the data by the user should be noted in the metadata.
Technical prerequisites:
Geographic information sytem (GIS), computer-aided drawing or other mapping software is necessary to display, view and access the information.
Distribution Point of Contact
Contact information for the individual or organization distributing the data.
Organization: State of Connecticut, Department of Enviromental Protection
Phone: 860-424-3540
Fax: 860-424-4058
Email: dep.gisdata@ct.gov
Hours of service: Monday to Friday, 08:30 to 16:30 Eastern Standard Time
Address type: mailing and physical address
Address:
79 Elm Street
City: Hartford
State or Province: Connecticut
Postal code: 06106-5127
Country: USA
Standard Order Process
Common ways in which data may be obtained.
Digital form:
Format name: Shapefile, Feature Class
Format version number: ArcGIS
File decompression technique: Zip file
Digital transfer option:
Online option:
Computer information:
Network address:
Network resource name: http://www.ct.gov/deep
Fees: An online copy of the data may be accessed without charge.
Custom Order Process
Description of custom distribution services available.
Custom order process:
The data distributor does not provide custom GIS analysis or mapping services. Data is available in a standard format and may be converted to other formats, projections, coordinate systems, or selected for specific geographic regions by the party receiving the data.
+ Metadata Reference
Metadata Date
Dates associated with creating, updating and reviewing the metadata.
Last updated: 20111209
Language of metadata: en
Metadata Point of Contact
Contact information for the individual or organization responsible for the metadata information.
Organization: State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection
Person: Howie Sternberg
Phone: 860-424-3540
Fax: 860-424-4058
Email: dep.gisdata@ct.gov
Hours of service: Monday to Friday, 08:30 to 16:30 Eastern Standard Time
Address type: mailing and physical address
Address:
79 Elm Street
City: Hartford
State or Province: Connecticut
Postal code: 06106-5127
Country: USA
Metadata Standards
Description of the metadata standard used to document the data and reference to any additional extended profiles to the standard used by the metadata producer.
Standard name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Standard version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Time convention: local time
Metadata profiles defining additonal information:
Profile: ESRI Metadata Profile
FGDC Plus Metadata Stylesheet
Stylesheet: FGDC Plus Stylesheet
File name: FGDC Plus.xsl
Version: 2.2
Description: This metadata is displayed using the FGDC Plus Stylesheet, which is an XSL template that can be used with ArcGIS software to display metadata. It displays metadata elements defined in the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (CSDGM) - aka FGDC Standard, the ESRI Profile of CSDGM, the Biological Data Profile of CSDGM, and the Shoreline Data Profile of CSDGM. CSDGM is the US Federal Metadata standard. The Federal Geographic Data Committee originally adopted the CSDGM in 1994 and revised it in 1998. According to Executive Order 12096 all Federal agencies are ordered to use this standard to document geospatial data created as of January, 1995. The standard is often referred to as the FGDC Metadata Standard and has been implemented beyond the federal level with State and local governments adopting the metadata standard as well. The Biological Data Profile broadens the application of the CSDGM so that it is more easily applied to biological data that are not explicitly geographic (laboratory results, field notes, specimen collections, research reports) but can be associated with a geographic location. Includes taxonomical vocabulary. The Shoreline Data Profile addresses variability in the definition and mapping of shorelines by providing a standardized set of terms and data elements required to support metadata for shoreline and coastal data sets. The FGDC Plus Stylesheet includes the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set. It supports W3C DOM compatible browsers such as IE7, IE6, Netscape 7, and Mozilla Firefox. It is in the public domain and may be freely used, modified, and redistributed. It is provided "AS-IS" without warranty or technical support.
Instructions: On the top of the page, click on the title of the dataset to toggle opening and closing of all metadata content sections or click section links listed horizontally below the title to open individual sections. Click on a section name (e.g. Description) to open and close section content. Within a section, click on a item name (Status, Key Words, etc.) to open and close individual content items. By default, the Citation information within the Description section is always open for display.
Download: FGDC Plus Stylesheet is available from the ArcScripts downloads at www.esri.com.